1. Some members were not receiving emails sent from XJbikes.com. For example: "Forgot your password?" function to reset your password would not send email to some members. I believe this has been resolved now. Please use "Contact Us" form (see page footer link) if you still have email issues. SnoSheriff

    Hello Guest. You have limited privileges and you can't "SEARCH" the forums. Please "Log In" or "Sign Up" for additional functionality. Click HERE to proceed.

xj900 -83 ignition coil resistance

Discussion in 'XJ Technical Chat' started by tjantunen, Dec 8, 2021.

  1. tjantunen

    tjantunen New Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Finland
    Hi,

    As a backgroud, I bought the xj900 1983 this summer and have not run basically at all with it. Just tested that motor was running somewhat good (had a lot of air leaks in intake). Now I have basically disassembled the whole bike and building cafe racer style bike from it.

    I have now measured ignition coils and got following readings from both coils:
    Primary: 3,0 ohms
    Secondary: 11,9k ohms


    For all XJ900RK, RL, N, FN, and F models:

    Primary (input from TCI): 2.7 ohms +/- 10%
    = 2.43 ohms - 2.97 ohms acceptable range

    Secondary (output to spark plugs): 13.2K ohms +/- 20%
    = 10,560 ohms - 15,840 ohms acceptable range


    So secondary measurements are clearly under tolerances but how about primary ones? Becaause those are a bit over threshold? Is it a sign that coils are worn out and needs to be replaced?
     
  2. tjantunen

    tjantunen New Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Finland
    I tried to add page url to post from where I found those reference numbers but for reason or another forum sw was saying I am spamming. Page was xj4ever
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
  3. Huntchuks

    Huntchuks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East Rochester, NY
    I think you can round the second decimal place up. Your meter might have more error than that. Just my opinion, may be wildly wrong.
     
  4. tjantunen

    tjantunen New Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Finland
    I was thinking that one too. But liked to hear some opinions because resistance is on upper limits.
     
  5. Rooster53

    Rooster53 Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North, FL
    Very common to be slightly high using a common DMM - you can subtract the reading you get from touching the probes together or to one of the terminals under test.

    I would say if the coils are in good physical shape with no cracks you are good to go.
     
  6. tjantunen

    tjantunen New Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Finland
    Coils are in a good physical shape, no cracks etc. It was very minimal reading what I got by touching the probes together, like 0,02. So subtracting that from 3.0, I am almost in allowed tolerance :)
     

Share This Page